Stewart/Cramer – Instead of Thinking, Linking

If you haven’t already, you should watch Jon Stewart’s conversation with Jim Cramer from last night here. Everything Stewart says is dead-on, and he is a saint for doing it, and the celebration of Jon Stewart is fully justified. I am wondering, though, if I’m the only person who feels a tad bit uncomfortable, or sympathetic to Jim Cramer? The man is in way over his head. (Tangent: watching this girl in high school play Tori Amos, terribly, in front of everyone was rightly mocked and yet I had this strange sympathy for this poor girl. My reaction to Jim Cramer is very similar.)

Glen Greenwald, as he so often does, uses the Stewart/Cramer conversation as a tool for making several larger and crucial points. You really ought to read it.

They would continuously put scheming CEOs on their shows, conduct completely uncritical “interviews” and allow them to spout wholesale falsehoods.  And now that they’re being called upon to explain why they did this, their excuse is:  Well, we were lied to.  What could we have done?  And the obvious answer, which Stewart repeatedly expressed, is that people who claim to be “reporters” are obligated not only to provide a forum for powerful people to make claims, but also to then investigate those claims and then to inform the public if the claims are true.  That’s about as basic as it gets.
Today, everyone — including media stars everywhere — is going to take Stewart’s side and all join in the easy mockery of Cramer and CNBC, as though what Stewart is saying is so self-evidently true and what Cramer/CNBC did is so self-evidently wrong.  But there’s absolutely nothing about Cramer that is unique when it comes to our press corps.  The behavior that Jon Stewart so expertly dissected last night is exactly what our press corps in general does — and, when compelled to do so, they say so and are proud of it.



2 Responses to “Stewart/Cramer – Instead of Thinking, Linking”

  1. Deb Dutcher Says:

    One must remember it is not Cramer himself who put him in the place that he is/ was last and this year to make the statements that he did. A little recent history lesson reminds us of that. This is a bit of too much of the passing on of responsibility (that maybe should not be happening) of the American government. Not totally discounting him of his responsibility as a financial journalist mind you, but…

    Journalist and media professionals are people too.

  2. Lisa N Says:

    I agreed with everything Stewart said, but I found it weird that he was directing it at a guy who has kind of a comic/commentary/entertainment show on CNBC. Cramer doesn’t bill himself as a reporter, or his show as a news show. It seemed like Stewart’s complaints would have been better addressed to CNBC management or anchors (do they even have anchors?) or something.

    Stewart did keep backing off and saying “It’s not about you,” which indicated that he knew flinging all this at Cramer maybe wasn’t warranted, but that just made me feel like Stewart had developed his comments with a different guest in mind. It felt disjointed and weird to me.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: